Cases 1 - 10 of 10
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Leonard M. Ross
as 2:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Leonard M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07225
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Chimney Hill Properties, Ltd. et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
TBH19, LLC, Chimney Hill Properties, Ltd. and Leonard M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew Verdiglione v. Thomas Ira Ross et al
as 8:2016cv00921
Defendant:
Dance Academy Fitness, Does, Sima M. Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Verdiglione
Rossco Holdings Incorporated et al v. Michael McConnell et al
as 2:2013cv06339
Defendant:
Bear Kultgen Brophy Bostwich & Dickson LLP, Does, Larry Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard M Ross and Rossco Holdings Incorporated
Leonard M. Ross et al v. Robert M. Yaspan et al
as 2:2012cv07048
Defendant:
Does, Law Offices of Robert M. Yaspan and Robert M. Yaspan
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Ross and Leonard M. Ross
Edwin Figueroa v. RDR Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06803
Plaintiff:
Edwin Figueroa
Defendant:
RDR Foods Inc, Diane M Ross and Ronald L Ross
Diabetes Research Restitution, LLC v. Ronald Katz et al
as 2:2010cv09507
Defendant:
Robert W. Anderson, Michael J. Andrews, Brian Conn and others
Plaintiff:
Diabetes Research Restitution, LLC
Robert M Ross v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 8:2008cv01006
Petitioner:
Robert M Ross
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, California State Bar Association, Orange County Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
