Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Rocco Leo Gaglioti v. Makemake Entertainment Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02239
Plaintiff:
Rocco Leo Gaglioti
Defendant:
Makemake Entertainment Inc., Nuyorican Productions, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Collier v. Adam McKay et al
as 2:2023cv10227
Plaintiff:
William H Collier
Defendant:
Netflix, Adam McKay, Hyperobject Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Collier et al v. McKay et al
as 2:2023cv10230
Plaintiff:
William H. Collier
Petitioner:
Bluegrass Films
Defendant:
Adam McKay, Netflix, Hyperobject Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Collier et al
as 2:2023cv10229
Petitioner:
William H. Collier, Adam McKay, Netflix and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
William Harris v. Religion of Sports Media, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01862
Plaintiff:
William Harris doing business as William Harris Productions and William Harris individually doing business as William Harris Productions
Defendant:
Religion of Sports Media, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Evil Genius Games, Inc. v. Netflix CPX, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv08117
Plaintiff:
Evil Genius Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Netflix CPX, LLC, Netflix CPX International, B.V., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Counter Claimant:
Netflix Studios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lance Hara v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03456
Plaintiff:
Lance Hara and Vicky Vox
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Titmouse, Inc., LOL Send, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Francisco Ferrero Rodriguez v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ferreras Rodriguez
Defendant:
Netflix Inc., Nolita Cinema, David M Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Superprod v. Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
SUPERPROD
Defendant:
Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC and Does 1- 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
