Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Brian Houghton v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03133
Plaintiff: Brian Houghton, Stanley Houghton, Susan Effinger and others
Defendant: SYD Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc., Hennessy Industries, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Stephen N Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Clarence Leo Nesslein et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08858
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Does
Plaintiff: Clarence Leo Nesslein and Janet Nesslein
Cross Claimant: Square D. Company
Gaither Ward v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv10490
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, A B B Inc, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Plaintiff: Gaither Ward
Christina Pica-Van Dyke et al v. Bulldog Manufacturing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06505
Defendant: Bulldog Manufacturing Company, CBS Corporation, Certaineed Corporation and others
ThirdParty Defendant: CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. and Roes
Unknown: Derek S Johnson, Charles T Sheldon, Allison Low and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff: Phillip Alan Pica, Tina Marie Pica and Christina Pica-Van Dyke
Charles C Curtis v. Abb Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02014
Defendant: Abb Inc, American Insulated Wire Corporation, Borg Warner Morse Tec Inc and others
Plaintiff: Charles C Curtis
Unknown: Thomas Jeffrey Moses
Gail Barnes et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2010cv01379
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Buffalo Pumps Inc and others
Plaintiff: Gail Barnes and James Wayne Barnes
Nominal Defendant: Harold Barnes
James H. Prange et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv06698
Plaintiff: James H. Prange, James H. Prange, James H. Prange and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Square D Company v. JRL Electric Supply, Inc.
as 2:2007cv05787
Plaintiff: Square D Company, Square D Company, Square D Company and others
Defendant: JRL Electric Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?