Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Alfaro v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv03100
Plaintiff:
Mikaella Cristina Alfaro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Artiga et al
as 2:2012cv02370
Defendant:
Victor Artiga, Merle Madera, Timothy D. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gregory Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Artiga et al
as 2:2012at01259
Defendant:
Victor Artiga, Merle Madera, Timothy D Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gregory Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv02178
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff Department, McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfaro v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02113
Plaintiff:
Mika C. Alfaro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv01827
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff Department, McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv01686
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, County Midcally Indigent Services Program, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vang et al v. Decker et al
as 2:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
Nhia Kao Vang , Chao Xiong , David - Vang and others
Defendant:
Steven Decker, B Todd Jones and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vang et al v. Decker et al
as 2:2012at00653
Plaintiff:
Nhia Kao Vang , Chao Xiong , David - Vang and others
Defendant:
Steven Decker, B Todd Jones and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento , County Medically Indigent Services Program, Motel 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
