Cases 1 - 10 of 17,466
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenbarg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01578
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Nixon v. Morales
as 2:2024cv01531
Petitioner:
Brandon Nixon
Respondent:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Young v. Wright
as 2:2024cv01524
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tessmer v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Tessmer Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sipes v. Corcoran California State Prison
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Sipes
Respondent:
Corcoran California State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01511
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dillon v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
Akeem Dillon
Respondent:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Dehart v. Eastern District Federal Court
as 1:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
Jeremy Cole Dehart
Respondent:
Eastern District Federal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
