Cases 11 - 20 of 1,860
(PC) Overstreet v. Moseley
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Ryan Overstreet
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bronson v. Gallardo et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Bronson
Defendant:
Gallardo and Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bradford v. Spangler et al
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Jane Doe, G. Spangler and Howard E. Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thompson v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Thompson
Defendant:
A. Lopez, J. Rocha, E. Olivias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thompson v. Lopez et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Thompson
Defendant:
A. Lopez, J. Rocha, E. Olivias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Saintillus v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Chaloner Saintillus
Defendant:
United States of America, Phillip A. Talbert, Samuel E. Stefanki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Saintillus v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Chaloner Saintillus and Shalam Saintillus-Bey
Defendant:
United States of America, Phillip A. Talbert, Samuel E. Stefanki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Jung et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jung, B. Jones and Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Dobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
M. Dobbs and J. Slaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
