Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Sexton v. State of California, et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Sexton
Defendant:
State of California, Dept. of Corrections and Stem Cell Research
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federico v. Kern County Public Defender's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A. Federico
Defendant:
Kern County Public Defender's Office, Kern County Sheriff's Dept. and County of Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Sacramento Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McDaniel
Defendant:
Sacramento Police Dept. and Sacramento Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 1:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
Shaun Bishop, Armond French and Fresno County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al
as 1:2013at00180
Plaintiff:
Ervin W. Ervin
Defendant:
Merced Police Dept. , Officers , E. Chavez-Badge #156 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al
as 1:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Ervin W. Ervin
Defendant:
Merced Police Dept. , Officers , E. Chavez-Badge #156 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ervin v. Merced Police Dept et al
as 1:2012cv01779
Plaintiff:
Elton Whittney Ervin
Defendant:
Merced Police Dept, E Chavez, Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heinke v. County of Tehama Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 2:2012cv02433
Plaintiff:
Robert Heinke
Defendant:
County of Tehama Sheriff's Dept. and Clayton Delaughder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2012cv01443
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doyle
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Madera Sheriffs Dept and Madera Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
