Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Dias v. Avila et al
as 1:2024at00250
Plaintiff:
Sean Dias
Defendant:
William Avila and Dominick Garay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dias v. Avila et al
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sean Dias
Defendant:
William Avila and Dominick Garay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wachs v. City of Delano et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wachs
Defendant:
City of Delano, County of Kern, Cabezuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Cook v. Sims et al
as 1:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Ron Cook
Defendant:
Ron Sims, James Funk, Salina Correa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Sacramento Downtown Arena, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila and Mark Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020at00673
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Universal Protection Service, LP and others
Petitioner:
Mark Matthews
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernier, III et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2018at00615
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernier, III and Nadezhda Ustinenkov
Defendant:
Pablo Lopez, Michael Walker, Corde Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Bernier, III et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv01131
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernier, III and Nadezhda Ustinenkov
Defendant:
Pablo Lopez, Michael Walker, Corde Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
