Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Dailey v. Wellpath et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dailey
Defendant:
Wellpath, Dinesh Nagar, Michael McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Mcdonalds Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Mcdonalds Incorporated, Claudia and Uber Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Legardy v. McDonalds
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Fletcher Sherman Legardy
Defendant:
McDonalds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARRIS et al v. HENRY MILLER RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 2131 et al
as 1:2021at00608
Defendant:
MICHAEL CANNON, PETER CANNON MICHAEL, HENRY MILLER RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 2131 and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS FARMS, LP and F. RUSSELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Harris et al v. Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131 et al
as 1:2021cv00882
Defendant:
Michael Cannon, Peter Cannon Michael, Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131 and others
Plaintiff:
Harris Farms, LP and F. Russell Harris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018cv02035
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Brent Cardall, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018at01231
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Defendant:
Brent Cardall, County of Yolo, Yolo County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
