Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Courthouse News Service v. Toste et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01790
Plaintiff: Courthouse News Service
Defendant: Amanda Toste, Hugh Swift, Shawn Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Toste et al
as 1:2021at01114
Plaintiff: Courthouse News Service
Defendant: Amanda Toste, Hugh Swift, Shawn Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton-Pryor v. Simpson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02477
Plaintiff: Ruth Shelton-Pryor
Defendant: Wesley Simpson, Dan Acfalle and Nickolas Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
C. v. Medd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02614
Plaintiff: K. C.
Defendant: Gordon Medd, Erica Sloane and Katie Messerli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Harrell v. George et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00253
Plaintiff: Peter T. Harrell
Defendant: Ray George, Clay Sloan, Beverly Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sloan et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv03070
Plaintiff: Gene William Sloan, Bert U. Sloan, John Omar Sloan and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Dale H. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Sloan et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior, et al
as 2:2008at01525
Plaintiff: Gene William Sloan, Bert U. Sloan, John Omar Sloan and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Dale H. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?