Cases 11 - 20 of 345
(PC) Kelly v. Cross et al
as 2:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
R Cross, Jiun Ma, Haing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Curry v. Rollin et al
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Ryan Indiana Curry
Defendant:
Rollin, Kelly, Duty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hawkins v. Santoro
as 2:2023cv00641
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hawkins
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hayes-Kelly v. Curry et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Nicholas K. Hayes-Kelly
Defendant:
Clinton J. Curry, Ashley C. Tuft and Tyler Johannes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Kelly v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv00537
Petitioner:
Andy Karl Kelly
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKinney v. Santero
as 2:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Nathaniel McKinney
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jacques v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael E Jacques and Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jeff Macamber, Jeffery Lynch, Kelly Franceshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Allen v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
John Aldon Allen
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Kelly Santoro, Dr. Shittu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) McFadden v. Santoro
as 2:2022cv02244
Petitioner:
Akeim Rashad McFadden
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Onley v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv01795
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Franklin Onley
Defendant:
D. Davis, A. Dohoda, L. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
