Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007at00253
Petitioner:
Edward B. Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007at00256
Petitioner:
Edward B. Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers, et al
as 2:2007cv00531
Petitioner:
Edward B. Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madrid v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00331
Petitioner:
Danny Madrid
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00258
Petitioner:
Eddie Barton
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandhu v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 1:2007cv00248
Plaintiff:
Sandeep Sandhu
Defendant:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers, Attygalla, Atmajian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villegas v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00230
Petitioner:
Gustavo Villegas
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trevino v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00169
Petitioner:
Arnold Trevino
Defendant:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00122
Petitioner:
Victor Phillips
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00086
Petitioner:
Mark McGuire
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
