Cases 71 - 80 of 44,537
(PC) Barnette v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barnette and Kenneth Wilson Barnette
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff Dept., Sacramento County Main Jail Commander, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kern v. Ha et al
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
James Kern and James Curtis Kern
Defendant:
Ha and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Scott v. Padilla
as 2:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jamurl A. Scott
Defendant:
Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Drinnon v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Drinnon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Dauwalder v. Atherton et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dauwalder
Defendant:
J. Atherton, J. Perez, Rostislav Davydov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayburne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Azpera v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Azpera
Defendant:
J. Campos and G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Briggs v. Schuyler
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
C Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
