Cases 161 - 170 of 124,914
(HC) Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz et al
as 2:2024cv02467
Respondent:
A. Kalra, Entire Assembly and Senate, Assembly Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie E. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kelly v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Sgt. Tennis, Gena Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hickman v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Defendant:
Gena Jones and State of California
Plaintiff:
Kevin Duane Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Tom et al
as 2:2024cv02461
Defendant:
Tom, Aleen, Monique and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Approximately 25 Firearms
as 1:2024at00711
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Approximately 25 Firearms
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States v. Approximately 25 Firearms
as 1:2024mc00111
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Approximately 25 Firearms
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
(SS) Gallegos v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Stanley A. Boone and Laura Lemasconi
Plaintiff:
Benny De Carlo Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Buchanan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02466
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Nicole Renee Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Drummond et al v. Phlebxpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01199
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Vasquez v. Penske Logistics, et al.
as 1:2024cv01068
Defendant:
Penske Logistics and Mark Albert Morlok
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Guzman Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
