Cases 11 - 20 of 191
(PC) Roney v. Archie et al
as 2:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Ervin Demetrice Roney, II
Defendant:
P. Archie, F. Navarro and K. Aube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Talavera v. Ravijot et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Talavera
Defendant:
Dr. Gill Ravijot, Dr. Francisco Hernandez, April Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lupercio Navarro v. Attorney et al
as 2:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lupercio Navarro and Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
Attorney and Andrew Flier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Gates v. Navarro et al
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Johnny Howard Gates
Defendant:
M. Navarro, F. Barrios and J. Alejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villegas, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
Javier Navarro Villegas and Luis Navarro Villegas
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
(PC) Alexander v. Andes et al
as 2:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Defendant:
Andes, Williamson, Shroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022at00951
Plaintiff:
Patricia Navarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01563
Plaintiff:
Patricia Navarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
