Cases 21 - 30 of 285
DeMoss et al v. City of Visalia
as 1:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeMoss, William Qualls, Will Binder and others
Defendant:
City of Visalia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
DeMoss et al v. City of Visalia, California
as 1:2022at00589
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeMoss, William Qualls, Will Binder and others
Defendant:
City of Visalia, California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Mendoza v. Matteson et al
as 2:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
John Mendoza
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, Povpovits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. Thomson International, Incorporated
as 1:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peterson, Sadie Floding, Colin Strub and others
Defendant:
Thomson International, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Price v. White et al
as 2:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Steve White, Ernest Sawtelle, Jeremy Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Price v. Barnes et al
as 2:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Deborah Barnes and Jeremy D Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jace v. Lirones et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael Jace
Defendant:
Margaret Lirones, Ken Clark and A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Barton v. Peterson et al
as 2:2022cv00616
Petitioner:
William Barton
Respondent:
Jeremy D Peterson and Josie Gostelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Peterson v. Bowen et al
as 2:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kemoni Peterson
Defendant:
C. Bowen, Nedelcu, M. Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Arias et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
Arias, A. Peterson, N. Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
