Cases 31 - 40 of 191
De La Paz Navarro o/b/o Gilberto Rodriguez Alvarez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021at01069
Plaintiff:
Maria De La Paz Navarro o/b/o Gilberto Rodriguez Alvarez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
(SS) Navarro De Rodiguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01697
Plaintiff:
Maria De La Paz Navarro De Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
(PC)Fratus v. Sandhu et al
as 2:2021cv01869
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
J. Sandhu and A. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rosales v. Rios et al
as 2:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rosales
Defendant:
L. Rios, F. Navarro and M. Saeteurn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomeli Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021at00896
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Lomeli Navarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
(SS) Lomeli Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Lomeli Navarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
(PC) Gulbronson v. Randolph et al
as 1:2021cv01262
Plaintiff:
Eric Conrad Gulbronson
Defendant:
A. Randolph, J. Navarro, Kyle Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lupercio v. The People of the State of CA et al
as 2:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Mark Lopez, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lupercio v. The People of the State of CA et al
as 1:2021cv01257
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Mark Lopez, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Venegas v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Salvador Venegas
Defendant:
Grimsky, Nurse Chapisan, E. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
