Cases 41 - 50 of 180
Reedom v. City of Tulare et al
as 1:2018at00736
Plaintiff:
Bobby Reedom
Defendant:
City of Tulare and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sream, Inc. et al v. Newton et al
as 2:2018at01490
Plaintiff:
RooR International BV and Sream, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Jimmie Newton and Renee Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sream, Inc. et al v. Raj et al
as 2:2018at01491
Plaintiff:
RooR International BV and Sream, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Gurmail Raj
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Abrantes v. Williams & Fudge, Inc. et al
as 1:2018at00637
Defendant:
Williams & Fudge, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Plaintiff:
Jogert Abrantes
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
HAGWOOD v. Kern County et al
as 1:2018at00591
Plaintiff:
RHONDA HAGWOOD
Defendant:
Kern County, NICK EVANS, TODD NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sream, Inc. et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2018at01300
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Satwinder Singh and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sream, Inc. et al v. Marahar et al
as 1:2018at00540
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Tara Singh Marahar and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sream, Inc. et al v. Marahar et al
as 1:2018cv00998
Defendant:
Tara Singh Marahar and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Plaintiff:
RooR International BV and Sream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sream, Inc. et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2018at01226
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Mohinder Singh and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sream, Inc. et al v. Refai et al
as 1:2018cv00993
Defendant:
Zakaria Badr Refai and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Plaintiff:
RooR International BV and Sream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
