Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff: Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_defendant: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, et al. v. Ken Salazar, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02230
Plaintiff: Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, Ed Beaman, Cleveland Casey and others
Defendant: Ken Salazar, Larry Echo Hawk, Dale Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02091
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02875
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes None
FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE
as 1:2009at00543
Plaintiff: FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE, FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE and FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Family Farm Alliance v. Kenneth Lee Salazar, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01201
Plaintiff: Family Farm Alliance, Family Farm Alliance and Family Farm Alliance
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01053
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009at00462
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
Stewart & Jasper Orchards et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00892
Plaintiff: Stewart & Jasper Orchards, Stewart & Jasper Orchards, Stewart & Jasper Orchards and others
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior, Ken Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Franco, et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01072
Plaintiff: Caleen Sisk Franco, Mark Franco, Winnemem Wintu Tribe and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Declaration re: Indian Tribal Water Rights
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?