Cases 51 - 60 of 476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gurudu-Group LLC v. RAM Robinsons Automation Machinery LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Gurudu-Group LLC
Defendant:
RAM Robinsons Automation Machinery LLC, Robinsons Automation Machinery Limited and Mino Automation USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(HC)Robinson v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01369
Petitioner:
Jacinto Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Robinson v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01186
Plaintiff:
Lavell Teran Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(PC) Robinson v. Scottini
as 2:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Scottini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Robinson v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Robinson v. Acuna et al
as 2:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Alexander Acuna, Ty Jones and Mason Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Robinson v. Hurra et al
as 2:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
G. Hurra, D. Torres, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Robinson v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01595
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
L. Smith, J. Grove and E. Cotor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
