Cases 61 - 70 of 92
Hammonds v. Salinas et al
as 2:2010cv03439
Plaintiff:
Mario Hammonds
Defendant:
S.M. Salinas, R. Ruffin and Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams, et al v. USA, et al
as 2:2004cv00979
Defendant:
USA , Ann M Veneman , Farm Service Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Terry A Adams, Sr , Linda G Adams , Trevor D Adams and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
USA
Thirdparty_defendant:
Patricia McCauley and Patrick McCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mack v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2009cv02078
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Derral G. Adams, Maurice Junious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Haase
as 2:2009cv03189
Respondent:
Bobby Haase
Petitioner:
William Gregory Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammond v. Haase
as 2:2009at01845
Respondent:
Bobby Haase
Petitioner:
William Gregory Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marsh v. Vegianelli, et al.
as 1:2009cv01282
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Marsh
Defendant:
M. Vegianelli, W. Alvarez, C. Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsh v. Vegianelli et al
as 1:2009cv01243
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Marsh
Defendant:
M. Vegianelli, W. Alvarez, C - Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammonds v. Hampton et al
as 2:2009cv00920
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hammonds
Defendant:
B. Hampton and M. Sweat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
