Cases 71 - 80 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nelson-Devlin et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 2:2014cv02811
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nelson-Devlin , Dennis Devlin , Alfonso Racacho, Jr and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. March Lane Medical Dental et al
as 2:2014at01400
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
March Lane Medical Dental and Carepoint Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. March Lane Medical Dental et al
as 2:2014cv02593
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
March Lane Medical Dental and Carepoint Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lane et al v. Applied Engineering and Geology, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02488
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Lane and Samantha B. Lane
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA and State of California
Defendant:
Applied Engineering and Geology, Inc. and Earl Stephens
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv02391
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lee Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 2:2014at01230
Plaintiff:
Melody Lane
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lane v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 2:2014at01232
Plaintiff:
Melody Lane
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lane v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Melody Lane
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
B.O.L.T. et al v. City of Rancho Cordova et al
as 2:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
B.O.L.T. , Mark Temple , John Dalke and others
Defendant:
City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
