Cases 1 - 10 of 3,877
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniel v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Dajon Daniel
Defendant:
E. Bradley Nelson and Malary Getty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Reid et al v. Colusa County Office of Education et al
as 2:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
Joscelyn Reid and E. R.
Defendant:
Colusa County Office of Education and Raul Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Theresa E. McClure
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Pan Pacific RV Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
