Cases 1 - 10 of 116
(PC) Rajagopal v. Modesto Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
Gopi Rajagopal
Defendant:
Modesto Police Department, Stanislaus County Public Defender, Stanislaus County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Solis v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jesse Solis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reynolds v. Crlollos et al
as 1:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Reynolds
Defendant:
R. Crlollos, Venesuela, Zavala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS)Solis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Edward Solis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Solis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022at00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Solis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Raquel et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shelly Raquel and Erika Camriegh Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Raquel et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2021at00113
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shelly Raquel and Erika Camriegh Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brill et al v. Postle et al
as 2:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sluzinski, Thomas Morris III, Adam Duong and others
Defendant:
King's Casino, LLC, Justin F Kuraitis, Michael L Postle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC)Uhuru v. Singh et al
as 2:2020cv01664
Defendant:
R. Singh, C. Brown, Karla Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
