Cases 1 - 10 of 55
(PC) Armenta v. Frank
as 2:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Armenta
Defendant:
Robert Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Grzeslo v. Phillips, et al.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
H Smith, N. Ndu, Bryan D. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Motley v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Edward Motley
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Correctional Supervising Cook, Correctional Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Armenta v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, Shalom Orenstein, Brian Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Armenta v. Miranda et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Rafael Miranda, K. Reuter, B. Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kidwell v. Collins, et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper, Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell and Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Jason Collins, Donna Williams, Jose Cisneros Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Armenta v. Gipson et al
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Johnson, Trenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Harper v. Collins et al
as 2:2022at00435
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper
Defendant:
J. Collins, D. Williams, J. Cisneros-Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Armenta v. Shah et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Shah, Keith Taylor, Nicholas Theobald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
