Cases 1 - 10 of 32
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Ron Broomfield and T. Ismans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Corey Mitchell
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, R. Broomfield, N. Albonico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lancaster v. Ayers et al
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derric Lancaster
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022at00706
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Harrison v. Broomfield
as 2:2020cv01838
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Petitioner:
Bryant Eugene Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
