Cases 1 - 10 of 28
(PC) Lancaster v. Ayers et al
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derric Lancaster
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022at00706
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Harrison v. Broomfield
as 2:2020cv01838
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Petitioner:
Bryant Eugene Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Stanley v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2020cv01509
Defendant:
Lujan, Ronald Broomfield, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Frank Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Balzarini v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv01457
Defendant:
R. Broomfield, Ralph Diaz and Gavin Newsom
Plaintiff:
St. Michael Balzarini and Michael Balzarini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith, Jr. v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2018cv01236
Defendant:
R. Broomfield, Officer R. Rodriguez, S. Ponse and others
Plaintiff:
Coleman Kenyatta Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burghardt v. Borges, et al.
as 1:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
Darryl Burghardt
Defendant:
L. Borges, J. Renteria, J. Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
