Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024at00317
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Ramos et al v. Funding Rush, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Ramos, Diana Ramos and Eric L. Ramos
Defendant:
Funding Rush, Inc., Andrew Adrian Dioli, Ralph Martinez and others
Counter Defendant:
Lexington Mortgage Company and Lil' Wave Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00446
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Cheng Thas Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Saeteurn et al v. Dobson, et al.,
as 2:2020cv01754
Plaintiff:
Sandy Saeteurn, Meuy Saechao, Nai Saeteurn and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Joshua Dobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saeteurn et al v. Dobson, et al.,
as 2:2020at00836
Plaintiff:
Sandy Saeteurn, Meuy Saechao, Nai Saeteurn and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Joshua Dobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. 4885 Granite, LLC et al
as 2:2015at01345
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
4885 Granite, LLC, Wen Zhi Deng, Cheng Fa Fang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. 4885 Granite, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02698
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
4885 Granite, LLC, Wen Zhi Deng, Cheng Fa Fang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
