Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Estate of Darryl Mefferd et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv02464
Plaintiff:
Evangelina Humphrey and Estate of Darryl Mefferd
Defendant:
City of Vallejo, Andrew Bidou and Jeremy Callinan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Toepfer et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Pam Nelson, Robert Toepfer, Joan Alford and others
Defendant:
Dale Matsuoka, Natalie Peterson, Golden Boy Security Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
J.C., et al., v. City of Vallejo
as 2:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
J. C. and M. G.
Defendant:
City of Vallejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.C., et al., v. City of Vallejo
as 2:2024at00861
Plaintiff:
M. G. and J. C.
Defendant:
City of Vallejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2024cv01828
Defendant:
Zach Horton, City of Vallejo and Ted Garcia
Plaintiff:
Jayme Rush and Calvin Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rush et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2024at00823
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rush and Jayme Rush
Defendant:
Ted Garcia, Zach Horton, City of Vallejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Green v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv01292
Plaintiff:
Maiya Green
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Colin Eaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Bryson Jones
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Matthew Komoda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024at00560
Plaintiff:
Maiya Green
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Colin Eaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMahon v. Whitney et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
Ryan McMahon
Defendant:
John Whitney, Shane Bower and City of Vallejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
