Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 1:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 2:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funtanilla v. Tristan et al
as 1:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
Gregorio C. Funtanilla, Jr.
Defendant:
David Tristan, George Galaza, Fred - Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2010at00286
Plaintiff:
Ray Byron Ford
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , M Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2010cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ray Byron Ford
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , George Galaza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. The State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00636
Plaintiff:
Percy Stockton
Defendant:
The State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcenaux v. Schwarznegger et al
as 1:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
John Arcenaux
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarznegger, Kates, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micenheimer v. Galaza et al
as 1:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
Cory Dwayne Micenheimer
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, George A. Galaza and Francisco Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Galaza
as 2:2003cv01723
Petitioner:
Victor Hunt
Respondent:
George M Galaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dept of Corrections, et al
as 1:1997cv06173
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
- Dept of Corrections , Galaza and Kings County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
