Cases 1 - 10 of 38
(PC) Torres v. Newsome et al
as 2:2024cv02447
Defendant:
Rueter, Kelly, M. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Abraham L. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Baldiosera Torres v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02416
Defendant:
Hunter Jacqueline Burnette, Matthew Samuel Adler, Janice M Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Baldiosera Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Williams
as 2:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Peter M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Cox v. Bal et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
I. Bal, M. Williams and T. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Castro v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
K. Prather, B. Stacy, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cox v. Daram
as 2:2020cv01295
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Vasuki Daram, M. Williams, T. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) DeBose v. Annin et al
as 1:2019cv01771
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, Huynh, D. Foston and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight M. DeBose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Lambert G. Chambers
Defendant:
R. McFadden-Jensen, B. Stacy, C. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams-Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv02252
Plaintiff:
Lonnie M. Williams-Turner
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Maurice D. Robinson, County of Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Amay, et al.
as 1:2017cv01332
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Williams
Defendant:
Teresita Amay, Navdeep Baath and Bunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.