Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Approx. $110,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2022mc00153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $110,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Peng Jin Cai
(PC) Wilson v. Price et al
as 1:2019cv01680
Defendant:
Vanessa Pacheco, Brandon Price, Michael Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peng v. McDowell Edwards- PREFILING ORDER
as 2:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
Qinghua Peng
Defendant:
Amber Rose McDowell Edwards- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
USA v. Wa Heng Dou-Fu & Soy Sauce Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01358
Defendant:
Wa Heng Dou-Fu & Soy Sauce Corporation, Peng Xiang Lin and Yuexiao Lin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01859
Plaintiff:
Kong Peng Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
See v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009at00785
Plaintiff:
Peng See
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
See v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv01751
Plaintiff:
Peng See
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
