Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Tate v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tate
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, VITAS Healthcare Corporation, VITAS Hospice Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tate v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2024at00580
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tate
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, VITAS Healthcare Corporation, VITAS Hospice Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(HC) Tate v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
LeRoy Tate, Jr.
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Freeman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lauren Freeman and Caitlin Tate Freeman
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
(PC) Tate v. Calamia et al
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Derek Tate
Defendant:
Tiara Calamia, Joshua Robinson, E. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate, et al. v. Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Lakema Tate and Richard Ortiz
Defendant:
Wm. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
(HC) Sutton v. Tate
as 1:2023cv00330
Petitioner:
Frank P. Sutton
Respondent:
Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Young v. Tate
as 1:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Kareem Al-Jaml Young
Respondent:
B. M. Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
