Cases 1 - 10 of 23
(HC) Guyton v. U.S. Marshall's Service et al
as 1:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
Francisco G. Guyton
Respondent:
U.S. Marshall's Service, U.S. Parole Com. and Fresno County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ruth Timm and Awnika Zurfluh v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ruth Timm and Awnika Zurfluh
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, Anne Elizabeth Gaskins and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Miller v. Najera, et al.
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Edward Moreno, M.D., Fresno County Jail, Officer Guiterrez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hemsley v. U.S. Marshal
as 2:2018cv00634
Petitioner:
Richard David Hemsley
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. Garcia et al
as 1:2015cv01585
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Ryan Garcia, Delaney, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. Nevada Southern Detention Center, et al.
as 2:2015cv01728
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Nevada Southern Detention Center, Corrections Corporation of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. Chavez et al
as 2:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Michael Chavez, United States of America, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hossnieh v. U.S. Marshals
as 2:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Reza Hossnieh
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Minchaca v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jaime J. Minchaca
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Director of Federal Revocation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Kern County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00318
Petitioner:
Charles E. Dunn
Respondent:
Kern County Sheriff, Donny Youngblood, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
