Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PC) Cyrus v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Victor Renard Cyrus
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Quiring, A. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clemente v. Winkler et al
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Clemente
Defendant:
Winkler, Taylor, Freitas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casey v. Covello et al
as 1:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Hobbs, B. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casey v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv02240
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Hobbs, B. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al
as 1:2022at00464
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Wade Beasley, Beasley Law Group PC, Jeffrey J. Judd and others
Receiver:
Geoff Winkler
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al
as 1:2022mc00094
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Wade Beasley, Beasley Law Group PC, Jeffrey J. Judd and others
Receiver:
Geoff Winkler
(PC) Kahaku v. Clays et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kahaku
Defendant:
D. Clays, K. Wallace, A. Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Machado v. Clays et al
as 2:2019cv02566
Plaintiff:
Oscar Machado
Defendant:
D. Clays, K. Wallace, A. Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
