Cases 101 - 110 of 1,029
Grimes v. Wong et al
as 4:2012cv05698
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Gerald Wong, Nancy Davis and Alex Lilien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Hill
as 4:2012cv05673
Petitioner:
Robert Ellis
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Ellis
as 4:2012cv05563
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Gerald Ellis, M. Sepulveda, T. W. Wy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Community Hospital of General Hospital Release
as 4:2012cv05400
Petitioner:
Gilbert Robles Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Community Hospital of General Hospital Release
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. USA
as 4:2012cv05247
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mirza Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bonilla v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2012cv05091
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Superior Court of Alameda County et al
as 4:2012cv05090
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Superior Court of Alameda County and Jeffrey W. Horner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2012cv04894
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04422
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hutchison v. San Quentin Prison
as 4:2012cv03912
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jay Hutchison
Defendant:
San Quentin Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.