Cases 11 - 20 of 7,537
Ballonoff v. Professional Post Acute Center (PPAC) et al
as 4:2024cv04242
Defendant:
Franchesca Callejo, Professional Post Acute Center (PPAC), Sheila Robello and others
Plaintiff:
Selene Ballonoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baidan v. Romanovska
as 5:2024cv04473
Plaintiff:
Orest Baidan
Defendant:
Diana Romanovska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavez v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2024cv06378
Plaintiff:
AMANDA G CHAVEZ
Defendant:
City Of San Jose and BRYCE GINGERLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Santa Clara County
as 5:2024cv06343
Plaintiff:
Howard Young
Defendant:
Santa Clara County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kettenburg v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2024cv06237
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Kettenburg
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cardenas v. County of Napa
as 4:2024cv04248
Defendant:
County of Napa
Plaintiff:
Florinda Izazaga Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allums v. City of Oakland
as 3:2024cv06272
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allums
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Kemper Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv04183
Defendant:
Kemper Corp., Kevork Artinian, Ricardo Lara and others
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pilling v. City of Healdsburg
as 3:2024cv06254
Defendant:
City of Healdsburg
Plaintiff:
Jessica Pilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoopes Vineyard LLC et al v. County of Napa
as 3:2024cv06256
Plaintiff:
Cook's Flat Associates A California Limited Partnership California Limited Partnership doing business as Smith-Madrone, Summit Lake Vineyards & Winery LLC and Hoopes Vineyard LLC
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
