Cases 41 - 50 of 7,410
Barrera v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 4:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilkins v. City of Martinez
as 4:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
Todd Wilkins
Defendant:
City of Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robnett v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Robnett
Defendant:
City of San Jose and San Jose Police & Fire Department Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Langworthy v. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
as 4:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reyna et.al.
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Johnson and Mr. James C Johnson
Defendant:
Renee C. Reyna and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services LLC, Greg Golub and Spencer Persson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Irvine et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Parmindar Irvine and Michael Irvine
Defendant:
State of California, County of Contra Costa and City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elbaum v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Saul Elbaum
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
ABC Legal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
