Cases 111 - 120 of 10,129
Haddock v. People
as 5:2023cv05857
Petitioner:
Donnell Gerede Haddock and Joesph Cuasina
Respondent:
People and Judge G. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vines v. Hixon et al
as 5:2023cv05765
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Vines
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixon and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. Aventiv-Google-Comm. Center et al
as 4:2023cv05655
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Aventiv-Google-Comm. Center, Deputy Director Guerro, Gov. Grey Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Valdez v. Santa Clara County Jail
as 3:2023cv05734
Petitioner:
Ismael Valdez
Respondent:
Santa Clara County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla
as 4:2023cv05660
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clotfelter v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv05657
Petitioner:
Bruce Lee Clotfelter
Respondent:
Tami Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubbard v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv05614
Petitioner:
Umar Abdul-Shadeed Hubbard
Respondent:
G. Martinez and R. Bota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Humboldt County Superior Court
as 3:2023cv05586
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pierce
Respondent:
Humboldt County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bratcher v. Matteson et al
as 5:2023cv05566
Petitioner:
Hassan Lee Bratcher
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Cueva
as 5:2023cv05514
Petitioner:
Clinton D. Wallace
Respondent:
Danial Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
