Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Harrell v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv05337
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant:
Ryan Martin, San Mateo County Probation Department, Ema Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Aponte et al
as 1:2022cv02832
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Daniels
Defendant:
Steven Aponte, Alexander F. Cristancho and Barry Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arellano v. SJPD Task Force Units et al
as 3:2021cv08634
Plaintiff:
Rachel Arellano
Defendant:
SJPD Task Force Units, BFO, Special Operations, Street Crimes Officers, Barry Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Torres
as 3:2020cv08696
Defendant:
Wendy Torres
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2020cv05724
Defendant:
M. Carrillo, M. Gallegos, A. Torres Quesada and others
Plaintiff:
K. P., by and through her guaardian ad litem Danielle Singleton, Danielle Singleton, Coltrane Pearson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2020cv05726
Defendant:
O Hernandez, L Martin, M Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Singleton, Coltrane Pearson, Jr., Akaysia Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kidd et al
as 3:2020cv04656
Defendant:
Tammy, Torres, Kidd and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2020cv02752
Defendant:
Jose Gonzalez, Deborah Campbell, Reneelou Sobrepena and others
Plaintiff:
Magdaleno Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler Jordan Torres v. Scott Kernan et al
as 3:2019cv00126
Defendant:
G. Garcia, Ralph Diaz, K. Shuder and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Jordan Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Hansen et al
as 3:2017cv06587
Plaintiff:
Mario Torres
Defendant:
Mike Hansen, Daniel Smith and Concord Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
