Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rothman v. Pivotal Software, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07066
Defendant: Egon Pierre Durban, William D. Green, Pivotal Software, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: David Rothman
Bryden-Moore v. Nanometrics Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv05625
Defendant: Robert Deuster, Pierre-Yves Lesaicherre, Nanometrics Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Carol Bryden-Moore
Roberts v. Zuora, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03422
Plaintiff: Casey Roberts and New Zealand Methodist Trust Association
Defendant: Zuora, Inc., Tien Tzuo and Tyler Sloat
Petitioner: Kyle J. Krauseneck, Pierre Kohler, Danish Parbtani and others
In re Tesla Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv04865
Plaintiff: Kalman Isaacs, Carlos Maia, FNY Investment Advisers, LLC and others
Defendant: Elon Musk, Tesla, Inc., Brad W. Buss and others
Petitioner: Glen Littleton, Jiri Kulik, Jason Han and others
Interested Party: Gregory Reyes, Public Investment Fund of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Alvin Janklow
Not Classified By Court: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Egon Pierre-Durban and Daniel Dees
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Perron v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03335
Defendant: ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Peter Van Vlasselaer, Xiangmin Cui and others
Plaintiff: Albert Perron
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Martinez v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03230
Plaintiff: Nicholas Martinez
Defendant: ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Carl Gordon, Xiangmin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naugle v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03176
Plaintiff: Jeaneth R. Naugle
Defendant: ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Peter Van Vlasselaer, Xiangmin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Copp v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03109
Plaintiff: Joanne Copp
Defendant: ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Peter Van Vlasselaer, Xiangmin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Richard E. Marshall v. Exar Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv02334
Plaintiff: Richard E Marshall
Defendant: Exar Corporation, Ryan A Benton, Gary Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seeman v. Schulman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv02206
Plaintiff: Michael Seeman
Defendant: Brian Schulman , John D. Rainey , Patrick L.A. Dupuis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?