Cases 21 - 30 of 150
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd et al
as 5:2016mc80160
Plaintiff:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd, Benhua Wu and Mei Zhang
Miscellaneou:
Google, Inc.
Gonzalez et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv03282
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Gonzalez and The Estate of Nohemi Gonzalez
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. , Google, Inc. and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Keith Amaral et al v. Google Inc.
as 5:2016cv02553
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Amaral , Nanor Aghamal , Jonathon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doe 1 v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
Doe 1
Defendant:
Google Inc. and Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re Subpoena to Google, Inc.
as 3:2016mc80064
Defendant:
Subpoena to Google, Inc.
Petitioner:
Martha's Music for the services of William P. Corgan doing business as the Smash Pumpkins Cinderful Music as publishing designee of William P. Corgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2016mc80012
Plaintiff:
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC.
Miscellaneou:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Google Inc.
as 5:2015mc80101
Plaintiff:
ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Palo Alto Research, Inc.
Svenson v. Google, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv04080
Plaintiff:
Alice Svenson
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google Payment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLATT v. GOOGLE, INC.
as 3:2015cv04266
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW BLATT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Matera v. Google Inc.
as 5:2015cv04062
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.