Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Keifer et al v. Ackemann et al
as 5:2012cv05842
Plaintiff:
Kevin Keifer and Danna Keifer
Defendant:
Dean Ackemann, George Kennedy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2012cv05713
Plaintiff:
Jack Roe , John Doe and California Reform Sex Offender Laws
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris and City of Alameda
Intervenor:
Daphne Phung and Chris Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N. R. , a Minor, et al v. Harris et al
as 5:2012cv04322
Plaintiff:
Paul Villarruel , Nicole Romero-Villarruel and N. R.
Defendant:
Scott Harris, Davis, Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Persiani et al
as 5:2011cv06673
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
Persiani, Matt Clark, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gavin et al v. Marin Horizon School Incorporated
as 3:2011cv05053
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gavin , Robert Gavin , Minor Roe 1 and others
Defendant:
Marin Horizon School Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Binkovich et al v. Barthelmy et al
as 5:2011cv03774
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Binkovich
Defendant:
Barthelmy , Grohndahl , Panighetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Binkovich et al v. Barthelmy et al
as 3:2011cv03774
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Binkovich
Defendant:
Barthelmy, Grohndahl, Panighetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Hussein et al
as 5:2011cv03775
Plaintiff:
Robert Durham
Defendant:
Hussein, Nancy Doe, Rachel Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrose Gill v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2010cv05936
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gill
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Ten Unknown Named Defendants, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrose Gill v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05936
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gill
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Ten Unknown Named Defendants, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
