Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Carter v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2011cv04982
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carter
Defendant:
City of Oakland, City of Oakland Police Department, Anthony Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans et al v. MCM Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv04493
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Evans and Padraic (Pat) Lackey
Defendant:
MCM Construction, Inc. , Roadway Electric, LLC, Jim Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Villar v. Donovan et al
as 3:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Dario Campos Villar
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan, Housing and Urban Development, Jaimee Arone Modica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Fair Housing of Marin et al v. Cabot
as 3:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing of Marin, Sarah Scott and Anastazja Carter
Defendant:
John V. Cabot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pillay v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02226
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Derek Anthony Pillay
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., Susan L. Bostrom, Frank A. Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2008cv05349
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta L. Carter
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Rueben Bates, Denetta Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
