Cases 11 - 20 of 933
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Velarde et al
as 5:2024cv02782
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Latrice Carroll
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Velarde, Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Judge John C. Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe and Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Fregi et al
as 3:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Matthew Fregi and John Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
R.R. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
R R and R.R.
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia, Darrell Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
CDCR and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfenbarger v. USA
as 5:2024cv01592
Petitioner:
John Wolfenbarger
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
