Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv04038
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
T. Allen and D. Brisht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Simmons et al
as 4:2022cv03449
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Kelly V. Simmons, Judge Faye D. Opal, Paul M. Haakenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv03451
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
S. Gates, S. Sawyer, M. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Atenley et al
as 3:2022cv03032
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Warden Atenley, Doctor Michael Yeh, Doctor Lara Danils and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kelly v. Atenly et al
as 4:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Atenly, T. Allen, T. Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv02719
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
T. Allen, Atenley, Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison and Doctor Lara Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2022cv02519
Plaintiff:
Khalil Alexander Kelly
Defendant:
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, Dave Pine, Carole Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01546
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
