Cases 1 - 10 of 885
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Estes v. Vaca
as 3:2024cv02981
Plaintiff:
Tyrone B. Estes
Defendant:
Vaca, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. McVege et al
as 4:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
McVege, Bravo, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodgers et al v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales
as 3:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Rodgers, Michael Dean Rodgers and Albert L. Martinez
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Warden, et al
as 4:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility "B" Yard, Warden, California Institution for Men "A" Yard, Warden, Corcoran State Prison "3B" and "4B" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Dickerson v. Wheeler
as 4:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Dickerson
Defendant:
B. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Katherine Miller, Warren Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Hernandez
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kendricks R. Woods
Defendant:
Teresa B. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Gonzalez
as 3:2023cv06552
Plaintiff:
Sammy B. Sanchez
Defendant:
Doctor Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
