Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Northern California River Watch v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 4:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
Northern California River Watch
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Karwash et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 3:2009cv04847
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Karwash, Mohammed Karwash, Rosamaria Karwash and others
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Pomona et al v. Chevron USA Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00529
Plaintiff:
City of Pomona, City of Pomona, City of Pomona and others
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc., Chevron Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sullins et al v. Exxon/Mobil Corporation
as 3:2008cv04927
Plaintiff:
Carlton Sullins, Carlton Sullins, Rita Sullins and others
Defendant:
Exxon/Mobil Corporation and Exxon/Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sullins et al v. Exxon/Mobil Corporation
as 4:2008cv04927
Plaintiff:
Carlton Sullins, Carlton Sullins, Rita Sullins and others
Defendant:
Exxon/Mobil Corporation and Exxon/Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Riches v. Exxon Valdez et al
as 3:2007cv05871
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Exxon Valdez, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Joseph Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPPI-Somersville, Inc. et al v. TRC Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02648
Defendant:
City of Antioch, United States Air Force, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
SPPI-Somersville, Inc., Somersville-Gentry Inc. and West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
West Coast Home Builders, Inc. v. Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02225
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, General Motors Corporation, USX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
