Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Paul Clisham Painting and Decorating v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The et al
as 4:2017cv04878
Plaintiff:
Paul Clisham Painting and Decorating
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The and Roman Decorating Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matson Navigation Company, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The
as 3:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alpi International, Ltd v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The
as 4:2014cv02731
Plaintiff:
Alpi International, Ltd
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Deleon et al v. AC And S, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05447
Plaintiff:
Evangelina Deleon , Maria Elena Saavedra , Sandy Ramirez and others
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., 84 Lumber Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02761
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. and Kirk Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Maxim l Properties
Defendant:
A.M. Bud Krohn, Ultra-Chem International, Inc, Moyer Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
City of Emeryville v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The
as 3:2009cv05680
Plaintiff:
City of Emeryville and City of Emeryville
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The and Sherwin-Williams Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hamilton v. The Sherwin Williams Company
as 3:2008cv05563
Plaintiff:
Lorrell Hamilton
Defendant:
The Sherwin Williams Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
