Cases 21 - 30 of 31
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al -v- Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00941
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc. , Gilead Sciences Limited (GSL), Gilead Sciences ULC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States Of America et al v. Genentech, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
United States Of America , State of California , Colorado and others
Defendant:
Genentech, Inc., OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2009cv03651
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of and State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, State of Michigan, State of Montana, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of New York, S
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
People of the State of California et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv05775
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Hamilton v. Sanofi-Avenits
as 3:2008cv01986
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hamilton , State of Michigan , United States of America and others
Defendant:
Sanofi-Avenits
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
